On Friday, 18 May 2018 18:18:02 -03 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Just for clarification: The official source packages contain the licheck > > executables already. My aim is that a git checkout and the source packages > > we provide contain the very same content. > > I understand, but I'm asking you not to.
Here's something that would be acceptable: Do create the qt/licensing repo but make it empty, or just a README file or whatever is necessary. This repository can live in qt-project.org and be mirrored under github.com/qtproject. In your internal infra, use a different repository branched off from the public one, containing the licence checker binary and anything else you may need. This repository should never be shared. It's no different than my own qtbase, except that I do share it: https://gitlab.com/thiagomacieira/qtbase -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development