Thanks for all your input. I'll have a look at QUIP-6 and a closer look at the implementation.
2018-07-10 23:55 GMT+02:00 Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com>: > On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 12:31:30 PDT Lorenz Haas wrote: >> So I wonder if there is any technical/intentional reason why there is >> no timeout parameter? > > There may be. The problem with timed thread waits is that you need to wake up > and release state at the same time the signaller is trying to use that > content. > > I'm not saying this is an actual issue here as I don't know the code. But > there could be such an issue. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development