On Saturday, 21 July 2018 10:39:49 PDT Иван Комиссаров wrote: > 1. IDE integration. I really need the IDE know the correct CXX flags for > each separate file in my project - that is includes, c++ version and so on. > Currently i’m using a generated CMake file at my work and the integration > with Qt Creator is awful, i’m using IDE just as a simple text editor - > syntax highlighting breaks because IDE can’t find some headers (however, > goto definition works for them).
That's already more than what we have for qmake, so I wouldn't put this as a requirement. It's a nice-to-have. The point is that the tool has to be at least in feature parity with qmake and that includes cross-compilation and IDE support. > Yes, CMake has much more users than QBS, however, how many of them will > volunteer to work with CMake’s Qt Creator integration? 5 people? 10? 5 people would be more than what we currently have for either qmake or qbs today, so seems ok. > So the question is - is it easier to port QBS to be built without Qt or to > use CMake with Qt? Again, solving the build is easy. Please look into the requirements at (2). THAT is a lot harder. And all I'm asking is for experience. I don't want Qt to be the guinea pig. More to the point: I will not be part of the experimentation. Give me a mature tool. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
