On Sunday, 22 July 2018 01:57:59 PDT Tobias Hunger wrote: > All these are very reasonable to ask for. I personally would like to add > the following point for consideration: > > 4) Toolable > > A) works with IDE(s) -- preferably more than one
Hello Tobias The fact that we have an IDE of ours means this one should be reasonably easy to address, as we can make that IDE work with the tool. So long as the tool is actually toolable, of course. "More than one" would be quite a challenge. > B) Should be easy to hook in static and dynamic code analyzer tools Can you elaborate? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
