El martes, 31 de julio de 2018 11:41:15 -03 Thiago Macieira escribió: > On Monday, 30 July 2018 23:11:54 PDT Denis Shienkov wrote: > > As for me, is it prefferable variant will be *QBS* (it is best from the > > best). > > > > I'm do not like nor CMake, nor QMake, nor Autotools, nor something else. > > I would say the only two options in the running are qbs and CMake.
Just for curiosity I checked qbs' reverse dependencies (packages that require qbs installed in order to be built) in Debian. We currently only have two of them: qtcreator and dewalls (a library). -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
