> I would say the only two options in the running are qbs and CMake. About this, I don't know if C++ community acceptance is a criterion, but :
https://github.com/search?q=cmake https://github.com/search?q=qbs On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 4:41 PM, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote: > On Monday, 30 July 2018 23:11:54 PDT Denis Shienkov wrote: > > As for me, is it prefferable variant will be *QBS* (it is best from the > > best). > > > > I'm do not like nor CMake, nor QMake, nor Autotools, nor something else. > > I would say the only two options in the running are qbs and CMake. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
