On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 09:55:41AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 02:29:15 PDT Uwe Rathmann wrote:
> > I also googled for QT_XCB_NATIVE_PAINTING without almost no results. I
> > understand, that reverting a decision is not stuff for big announcements,
> > but for such an important improvement: has it been communicated at least
> > somewhere ?
> 
> Because it's not an important improvement for most people. Your case and 
> Denis's, as seen in this thread, are very specific. Most people are
> fine with the raster engine.

If "Most people do not $X" were a sensible line of reasoning in the
Qt context we could remove pretty much every feature in Qt one-by-one.

Most people are *not* using Linux.
Most people are *not* using Android.
Most people are *not* using iOS.
Most people are *not* using Window 7.
Most people are *not* using Window 10.
...

Most people are *not* using Webkit.
Most people are *not* using WebEngine.
Most people are *not* using print support.
Most people are *not* using 3D
...

Most people are *not* using CBOR
...

See the pattern?

Andre'
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to