On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 09:55:41AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 02:29:15 PDT Uwe Rathmann wrote: > > I also googled for QT_XCB_NATIVE_PAINTING without almost no results. I > > understand, that reverting a decision is not stuff for big announcements, > > but for such an important improvement: has it been communicated at least > > somewhere ? > > Because it's not an important improvement for most people. Your case and > Denis's, as seen in this thread, are very specific. Most people are > fine with the raster engine.
If "Most people do not $X" were a sensible line of reasoning in the Qt context we could remove pretty much every feature in Qt one-by-one. Most people are *not* using Linux. Most people are *not* using Android. Most people are *not* using iOS. Most people are *not* using Window 7. Most people are *not* using Window 10. ... Most people are *not* using Webkit. Most people are *not* using WebEngine. Most people are *not* using print support. Most people are *not* using 3D ... Most people are *not* using CBOR ... See the pattern? Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
