On Tuesday, 4 September 2018 23:26:27 PDT André Pönitz wrote:
> > Because it's not an important improvement for most people. Your case and
> > Denis's, as seen in this thread, are very specific. Most people are
> > fine with the raster engine.
> 
> If "Most people do not $X" were a sensible line of reasoning in the
> Qt context we could remove pretty much every feature in Qt one-by-one.

You're completely right. What I meant to say is that the audience is very 
restricted, which is why it wasn't announced widely. From what I gather, it's 
still got a few rough edges, so it wouldn't make sense to announce yet either.

As soon as it's usable, it should appear in the ChangeLog.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center



_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to