On Tuesday, 4 September 2018 23:26:27 PDT André Pönitz wrote: > > Because it's not an important improvement for most people. Your case and > > Denis's, as seen in this thread, are very specific. Most people are > > fine with the raster engine. > > If "Most people do not $X" were a sensible line of reasoning in the > Qt context we could remove pretty much every feature in Qt one-by-one.
You're completely right. What I meant to say is that the audience is very restricted, which is why it wasn't announced widely. From what I gather, it's still got a few rough edges, so it wouldn't make sense to announce yet either. As soon as it's usable, it should appear in the ChangeLog. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development