I'll argue with you about it being a p1. If the problem is confined to the all-members list, it's not a p1 problem because the information is still there via the inherits links, which are more useful for seeing what is inherited anyway. My own opinion is that the all-members list should be removed.
martin ________________________________________ From: Konstantin Shegunov <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2018 11:03:50 PM To: Martin Smith Cc: Sze Howe Koh; Qt development mailing list Subject: Re: [Development] Missing documentation in Qt 5.12 Not only are members missing, but links lead noplace. For example in the mentioned page metaObject() goes to http://doc.qt.io/qt-5.12/qwidget.html#metaObject which naturally doesn't exist. From what I can tell nothing that is inherited, beside the things explicitly overriden, appear in the list. Although I wouldn't presume to place fault, for me the bad impression was left not by the bug itself, which is pretty embarrassing, as so much as bouncing it around on the tracker for 10 days until ultimately a ping on the list prompted action ... I mean, we get it, there's not enough people and hours to handle all the bugs, but I *hope* it is not going to be necessary to bring P1s to the list so at least they get attention ... Disclaimer: I had conversed with Sze-Howe about this bugreport before he started this thread. Nitpick: Between 5.10 and 5.11 we magically got qt_metacall and qt_metacast (expanded out of Q_OBJECT) into the members list and of course the links are broken, but this listing of private(-use) members is long-standing (from Qt 4); although I'm pretty sure these are not intended to be employed by the users and they're never going to get a proper documentation page. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
