06.06.2019, 17:01, "Lars Knoll" <[email protected]>: >> On 6 Jun 2019, at 15:33, Иван Комиссаров <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Sorry, but the iOS should be properly supported before making the final >> decision. >> Building something on macOS is easy, building smth for iOS is harder. From >> the top of my head it is code signing and building "fat" binaries that >> should be tested as a proof of concept. > > Code signing has been out of scope for qmake as well, so that doesn’t count. > > I really wonder how important ‘fat’ binaries/mulitarch builds are for iOS > these days, given that Apple doesn’t support armv7 anymore. IMO, we can live > without those. But I agree that I’d like to have a regular armv8 build of Qt > for iOS working.
Apple used fat binaries a lot in the past so there is a high chance they'll do it in the future for making some other transition. -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
