________________________________________ From: Lars Knoll <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 3:07 PM To: Laszlo Agocs Cc: Konstantin Shegunov; Jaroslaw Kobus; Qt development mailing list Subject: Re: [Development] Moving math3d classes from GUI to CORE
> Hi, > After some thinking, I pretty much agree with Laszlo. QVectorND, QMatrix4x4 > and most other classes in math3d are really tuned towards graphics, and thus > make little sense in Qt Core. So +1 for keeping them where they are and in > addition a +1 for deprecating QGenericMatrix. > But I think that in this case would make sense to add the QMatrix3x3 class > now instead of returning a std::array. We could keep the class fairly minimal > in 5.15 so that it in practice is not much more than a wrapper around > float[3][3]. But we’d have the right type then and can add API for it as > needed for Qt 6. Hi again, I've just created https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-81655 for this. I list there some issues to be solved / decided, before the work can be started. Please comment. Thanks and regards Jarek _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
