On 02/02/20 21:55, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development wrote: > On 02/02/2020 17:38, Alberto Mardegan wrote: >> Believe it or not :-) I find std::shared_ptr easier to use when passing >> pointers to and from functions. And I never needed to put them into an >> array. > > This is a logical fallacy; "I don't need it, noone else does".
Yes, but it's a logical fallacy you yourself made up: I never claimed that std::unique_ptr is not needed. > And I still see no problem in that? What is the problem at looking a bit > outside one's comfort zone (or one's bubble) and realizing that simply > because the Standard Library uses snake_case, we can live with it just > fine? I'm certainly fine with it, as long as my code doesn't end up with a mixed style. This is certainly OK when I'm using some third party modules in some isolated source file, but I'm less fine with it when it's on types I need to use all over the place. Ciao, Alberto -- http://www.mardy.it - Geek in un lingua international _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
