On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 11:32:02PM +0100, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > On 02/02/2020 22:45, André Pönitz wrote: > > > This is a logical fallacy; "I don't need it, noone else does". > > But this is the argument the de-Qt-ers use when it comes to Qt convenience > > they don't need. > > Which Qt convenience in particular?
Directly affected are for instance functions operating on full containers in https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtalgorithms-obsolete.html Indirectly, standard containers have no direct equivalent of .contains(), so advocating using std over Qt has a similar effect here. > I seem to be advocating against duplication "for the sake of it", not when > there's strong arguments (e.g. convenience) for it. This is appreciated. Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
