On Wednesday, 5 February 2020 02:12:06 PST Alexander Akulich wrote: > Oh, I'm sorry for the spam! You already renamed error() getter to > sockerError() [1], so the issue is not relevant now. > It's a bit unfortunate to see such diversity in the API. error() > getter seems to be a convention in Qt. I thought that the same > convention is to use '-ed' verbs in signal names.
It is. The correct signal for an error situation is errorOccurred, like in QLocalSocket and QProcess. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel System Software Products _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
