>>We’re neither enforcing the use of ‘emit’ currently. And I honestly
>> find most of the alternatives to be worse than no annotation at all.

As an illustration, for many years, I have the naming convention to
start all my signals with... "signal"

eg. signalChange();

This notation is so intuitive that I often forget to write "emit" before the
call.

Philippe

On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:30:09 +0000
Lars Knoll <lars.kn...@qt.io> wrote:

> 
> 
> > On 26 Feb 2020, at 10:38, Alex Blasche <alexander.blas...@qt.io> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Lars Knoll <lars.kn...@qt.io>
> >>>> I’m not trying to make this only about emit. But it’s the concrete
> >>>> problem we’re facing now, and emit is IMO the one keyword where we
> >>>> simply don’t need a replacement because it has no real semantic meaning 
> >>>> in
> >> C++.
> >>> 
> >>> I don't think semantics matter here. It is all about annotation and 
> >>> readability.
> >> With the same arguments we design APIs. While Kai's survey is inconclusive
> >> about the actual solution, it is conclusive in one aspect. There is a 
> >> clear majority
> >> to have sth in place for annotation/readability purposes.
> >> 
> >> As Kai said, in this case a comment would do the trick just as well, no 
> >> need for a
> >> keyword or macro:
> >> 
> >> /*emit*/ mySignal(); or
> >> mySignal(); // emit
> > 
> > Can you see us adopting a coding style that enforces the use of such 
> > comments? Otherwise this will quickly change to comments being forgotten 
> > which makes the above suggestion less valuable. Although the alternatives 
> > have no semantics either they impress a stronger coding style than comments 
> > IMO.
> 
> We’re neither enforcing the use of ‘emit’ currently. And I honestly find most 
> of the alternatives to be worse than no annotation at all.
> 
> Cheers,
> Lars
> 
> > 
> > --
> > Alex
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development


_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development

Reply via email to