That neither does the change comparison, nor will it automatically notify about changes. You'd have to code both manually. I don't see a major improvement. Also, I guess this forces me to make the members public. Not really an alternative.
You don't need to make the members public. The moc-generated code can still access them if they're private. Correctly setting the value from C++ indeed requires some code this way, though. You can use setProperty("x", 14), but that is slow. In principle we could have moc generate code for the setter the same way it generates the signal implementation. In fact it already does generate such code, for the setProperty(), just in the wrong place. We'd need some syntax to instruct moc to generate the setter.
best regards, Ulf -- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
