On 12/05/2025 09:53, Volker Hilsheimer wrote:
Would a simpleQRangeItemModel be clear enough? The “Based” doesn’t seem to add a lot of clarity.
It does what it says, though. But before discussing this further...
Also, as discussed at Qt CS (and mentioned in the last point of the notes athttps://wiki.qt.io/QtCS25_-_QGenericItemModel): I would like to come up with some C++ template class that gives type-safe access to the model while also respecting QAIM requirements, but doesn’t require any usage of QModelIndex, role values etc. I suspect that “Adaptor” will be a good term to use for such a class. Something along the lines of:
... this is a more important issue. Is the above planned for QGenericItemModel itself, or would that be feature creep/out-of-scope and should be done by another class? If yes, what would QGIM role be if this other class gets also introduced?
Thanks, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com KDAB - Trusted Software Excellence
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
