Den ons 14 maj 2025 12:32Volker Hilsheimer via Development < development@qt-project.org> skrev:
> > On 12 May 2025, at 13:29, Kevin Kofler via Development < > development@qt-project.org> wrote: > > > > Volker Hilsheimer via Development wrote: > >> I suspect that “Adaptor” will be a good term to use for such a class. > > > > Is this not more commonly spelled "Adapter"? > > > > Kevin Kofler > > Both spellings are permissible, Adaptor is preferred in UK, Adapter in US > English. And since we go with US spelling in APIs and documentation, > Adapter would indeed be correct. > > Thinking more about the name, perhaps the “Item” is not important: > > * we have QAbstractListModel and QAbstractTableModel (not > QAbstractList/TableItemModel) > * we have QSqlQueryModel - again no Item > * in a QGenericItemModel, there are no items - there is just a begin/end > iterator that can be dereferenced > > So, perhaps QRangeModel is good/long/clear enough? “Range” is well defined > C++ concept (literally), and Model is a well established concept in Qt. > For me, you have a winner here. > > Volker > > -- > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development >
-- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
