Sorry, what exactly do you mean? The devicemap resource donation by OpenDDR was revised and restricted to parts where "Contributors are clearly known and identified", that's mostly an Apache IP requirement, not directly related to WURFL or any other strange fellows who believe they "own" such publicly available data.
Thus both contributions you can find in the JIRA ticket may differ from some of the resources you found in OpenDDR directly, though with 1.15 the two are getting closer together. On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Reza <[email protected]> wrote: > I thought there was no risk here. The licensing terms were clearly stated > as open and last I checked, data cannot be licensed. > > What would be the basis of any data ownership claim? If this is a device > map concern, why is it showing up in the openddr commit? > > --- > Sent from Blackberry Bold 9900 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Werner Keil <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 12:15:41 > To: <[email protected]> > Reply-To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: DDR Resources > > Hi, > > Given some or a lot was removed due to the risk of license or "data > ownership" claim issues from previous contributions (even if those were > contributed by people from the community who are even more unhappy about > how the WURFL fraction treats their contributions now) most of these are > unavoidable. > > If you and other proper members of Apache community contribute those BACK > to DeviceMap I don't think anybody or anything can keep you from doing so, > but they can't just be copied over from some other files. > > Regards, > Werner > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:05 PM, eberhard speer jr. <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm sorry, but aside from the fact that "smaller" and "fewer" is a bit > > of an understatement (72% smaller and 95% fewer), I seems to me that > > there was indeed a serious mistake and that is that such a dramatic > > change occurred -- whatever the reason may be -- without any > > accompanying or better yet, prior announcement or explanation ! > > > > Apart from that, even if the data is more up to date or more reliable, > > these sudden changes have serious implications for its usefulness : it > > is not as if 'old' devices ceased to exist and some of the 464 > > properties that disappeared are pretty important if not vital, like > > UAProf to name but one. > > > > I would imagine there are now a lot of 'unhappy campers' around and > > I'm one of them. > > > > Regards, > > > > esjr > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32) > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRHMTzAAoJEOxywXcFLKYceQMH/3BcOU9oykoA9vD2aM4wNYrv > > eZe4Dprzm4JzH5hwVYlhz+Su2Gh6Ea3cRYvZd7gBxUO5Ze5e4bwpwejQf2G8BTpw > > F7MVtcVbAdpGT65KBjD+lVq8eGSxcwtCCX6MSFaohy8U8NK/dloMsqgr/X4DkjgQ > > N+2gPG1mOf2CWzfynvrXmNuKkCxGXAahAnwDS1c0ARcbk0m2xUrUhqk2UoYHs5jW > > ZH5lIBmtEMsgvASq+SNacVSnJKxIe0YTB6VRTX518Hm5sfOGSOH01tHFc8vviFIT > > yeC82rCjyVSSJpKP24a2ZRUzvxcArvVjy8U2dVzeupX+DKB76xoNcBCtS/Zc/fQ= > > =96ro > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > >
