I went ahead and added the following patterns to my patch file which picked up most of the devices which failed my unit tests for 1.15:
<device id="genericPhone"> <list> <value>LG....</value> <value>NetFront</value> <value>Palm...</value> <value>SAMSUNG-SGH</value> <value>Up.Browser</value> <value>Windows CE</value> </list> </device> These devices will basically be classified generic feature phones which I believe is a correct general classification. ________________________________ From: eberhard speer jr. <[email protected]> To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 9:24 PM Subject: Test data sets -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, following up on the test data set idea and after having run some tests, here are the results (and data sets) : Using 60,050 unique ('mobile') user-agent strings, some of which refer to identical devices, I found : 1.14 : 26% unknown 1.15 : 69% unknown Seeing as I don't live in Java-land, I'm sorry to say things like "jira", "pom", "mvn" or "jenkins" don't mean anything to me. So, until us C# ignoramuses can be helped out or accommodated to make 'stuff' available, you can find the |-separated and zipped data-sets here : http://www.ducis.net/static/114.zip http://www.ducis.net/static/115.zip I would *very* much appreciate it, as I'm sure we all would, if more and specifically more 'up-to-date' user-agent strings could be made available for testing. esjr -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRJDP1AAoJEOxywXcFLKYcYwsH/AgsmK80Ypq0OX8pfVgl5BR9 rVkL11VcAl3Fa3Pi1GeNLSGpmWT8PjqZ1QeYTIUbBW1BMF6WZsbEhfL6kPNcUcVH ryO5dXnVi9A9unbU4H72zJwke1dLdvsU5B/UGhW5rylI3pc9WwkJ5zM+mj9Y6Zxt e1q6NBPZLYvEZNU0kHPwySOUB0+a1xGO7nygRMHfF7DzbaEdCeM0+cZDGBKyBqwp jysXYNkcX/Dng/ShZ/i1jn+jOYQbo6Ok6xG1z7FMBgxme9ltjOz3tfhYHHt1RsF2 CcUTpjR6HssBHfd5DHDBr3NEbsxo3SweAhAyYKjKqgxe3BGQJwyKNprcNcEy2ys= =GcBD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
