Eberhard/all, Thanks, I don't have a .NET environment to take a closer look, but just on a high level, does it implement any of the W3C "Specs" as per http://www.w3.org/TR/DDR-Simple-API/ ?
If the answer is "Yes" then for consistency we should insist on having a similar compatible implementation (aka "DeviceMap Simple DDR") for Java and any other language or platform we support. If the .NET version was to completely ignore or abandon the W3C specs, then backward-compatibility and a migration path for OpenDDR (and to a certain extent others, e.g. MaDDR, DeviceAtlas,...) users would be the main argument for the compatible W3C implementation. We need to decide as project and team if we want to provide that or not. The current "classifier" uses the same file-structure, maybe in other even optimized ways (see WURFL[?]) but it is not compatible with the W3C interfaces in any way. Werner On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:48 PM, eberhard speer jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Reza, > > my .Net implementations of the W3C interface are ready and like you > the questions I'm now facing is how to integrate. > Maybe we should bounce around some ideas and coordinate the > integration to the extent our respective 'platforms' allow ? > > esjr > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTvVYlAAoJEOxywXcFLKYciGwIAJfHGpUzpdwkm6DGmTuedzRE > vSVLG0LFcgrjvWyMMvJHN8s7R30eb/yubVZWAk28dz53SaG+HKznJP8r9b2nMwnA > CeAB/nz0/jQ09HlF59ycFhHPJPLBHl8SEcRniay1Y02c55Pnr06i9r9eVmumIjnu > 47+J6dBGVxyUH4ShbeHcOxA2JuCPSB4jasESF2jFaG0fUwbODVabSV7wPIMMaY8I > 2G6mQKBKl211xvNZtm4QnO0yZ9ak1Kx7CPN+z0x5thq4HDKDbM1AcIV4L0Q80VlX > Hb881GzQInDOsY9VK6zzFTUHtQtmNUX/QhLRpNiKweoPKQLMtwC9zaHrKzm04Kw= > =Pefu > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
