I'd encourage everyone to get discussions moving on a positive note. We're seeing movement towards a release from the DeviceMap community. This is a good (and welcome) step forward for the community. Working through problems and disagreements in a positive manner, would be an extremely positive step.
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Werner Keil <[email protected]> wrote : > The "official" release was broken, i.E. the version of the XML was wrong > not matching what the tag was intended to be, etc. > OK. So, discuss these problems with Reza and the rest of the community and see that they are fixed. > As mentioned, I am the person eligable to do this with the contribution > from OpenDDR. > Can you explain this? You are the person eligible to do what? > So please Bertrand, if there is a way to restrict certain users from SVN, > do this accordingly so that wrongful commits to this tree by Reza or others > cannot happen any more[?] > If you (or anyone else) feel that there are wrongful commits, please discuss the problems directly within the community. If differences cannot be resolved, there are mechanisms to address this. If you think community members are going to be restricted from SVN access, you are mistaken. It might be a good time to review how the ASF works -- http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html > Also note, the parent hierarchy of the POMs is inconsistent. "classifier" > not only differs from the POM artifactId (bad but if you don't want to > change it, keep it for now, just don't change the artifactId any more after > a release) it is an "orphan" without a proper parent[?] > Again, if there are problems or mistakes. Please identify them and work them out with the community. --kevan
