Yes, there is a tag here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/devicemap/tags/releases/devicemap-data-1.0.1/
RIM vs Blackberry, I believe this is correct. RIM changed their name to Blackberry before the launch of their new BB10 devices. RIM no longer exists post BB10. ________________________________ From: Werner Keil <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2014 3:53 PM Subject: Re: Data I only looked at the trunk, but did someone tag the state before the vote yet? On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 9:34 PM, eberhard speer jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Werner, > > sure no problem, I think the idea was to make it 1.0.2 after we've all > convinced ourselves everything is ok. > > Maybe we should stick to the plan : vote on 1.0.1 [nothing 'wrong' > with it] and then use this 'cleaner' version as basic for the real > 1.0.2 and establish a release pattern like once a month. I also still > have to check whether some of the 'returned' lost properties are > really properties that were lost by mistake rather then edited out for > a reason [already have a test for that]. > > Also would like to iron out some obvious stuff like "BlackBerry OS" vs > "RIM OS", or genericAcer vs genericAcer Incorporated vs genericACER > Incorporated [I have a list]. > > So, yes, if we're all agreed, in it goes for the 1.0.2 release. > > esjr > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUD1ZYAAoJEOxywXcFLKYcsZAIALsUy3iriKoQLsg+ieaAcY/S > xl0/zV7qcmlt9b/WdYavHuraCssi3ngkbXd4W1oguW+aLONzSpI26QyuRtWsQDL1 > Z0vsoaO+pj5EuNmk4d4j7KtIktF1y+jg2BhqYpsvL7mmhNMfk++KDjSnzY5j/r/z > 95ggsnE/MeQOBRP9KDKlnic6q+fmLngOnDhzZ4QsditRIVjL0Q9LC7YEUGwnaFUg > J+lNfO62RvX2QbN6XddKQMoynStKKGHZM9OgikEasOAMuQgGsWCLV0wI71rDhM+N > WE1HGeh/tpEkaZqLeo+f3zfFEWqp4BJ2z7ZdZsl7QhEVHkyC+DllSNEGAHuppSs= > =Jng+ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
