The large Number of "desktopDevice" answers your question and nobody suggested to define the core of that in patch, but both the Entry called "patchDevice" there has little value without a bit of explaining, nor does "genericDesktop" have a real value in the Main XML file without attributes of its own;-) The parent of all desktop things could be desktopDevice, the current setup at least makes an "incomplete" impression, just like some devices with missing width or height for whatever reason.
Am 10.09.2014 17:02 schrieb "eberhard speer jr." <[email protected]>: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > the reason I brought up the patch files is exactly the point Reza > makes : these files tend to turn into repositories for the weird and > vague. > > The patch files should patch *if* required. > So, I agree with Reza : if it is a 'functioning' device and pattern, > it belongs in the core files. > > esjr > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUEGe7AAoJEOxywXcFLKYc0x0IAM5Lp9Ks2NKWs/GAqp/0hjfk > QB4nP0J+ya2cK3JY8CcNeWgmyKwWV8yV2pekSg4g6tjGt/VtyJ1O4iFUR9jFDCBE > 81RVhGrAL2sCrqVXpVLwcEmYk1Hv+LB9KIMQsDJsGKm+WGUHSoSiWWmtI4LGdudy > 1ZenVfxRA1LxOI8qIP9vRLX3hi5dpG5Zg2hrDE0EYkG9PWaX7Db57YyywjeJ+xac > EOJGQpSLHe6M1P3OshoQdA2no8yqOYqTeM+5Ngo4n87NRCwFiW0WIrEZMZ+ltnu/ > MPaswu3RtsD48N/GqquIixChDe3x5+o0RstGEnaKxMA4VSdENu+vU6dOhkPkpUM= > =EhUb > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
