From: Grant Likely <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:36:50 -0600
> Weird. Yeah, no other platforms expect to get a phandle type > definition from the kernel headers. The only thing driving this > conversation is from arch/sparc/include/asm/Kbuild: > > header-y += openprom.h It was probably at one point for the sake of asm/openpromio.h but that header has no dependencies on openprom.h The only hit I can find in google code search, for non-kernel code, is the SILO bootloader. But that tree includes it's own copy of include/asm/openprom.h so the actual kernel copy isn't even used. I'd say we can stop exporting that header and also therefore not worry about making phandle_t visible to userspace. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
