On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 02:44:54PM -0700, David VomLehn wrote:
> I expect my device tree will have some proprietary, one-off devices in
> it. Is it better to wrap these all up in one node:
>
> cisco {
> device1 {
> ...
> };
> device2 {
> ...
> };
> };
>
> Or should they be specified one node at a time:
>
> cisco-device1 {
> ...
> };
> cisco-device2 {
> ...
> };
>
> My inclination is for the former, but I'd prefer to follow existing
> usage, if any.
Um.. what do you mean by "proprietary nodes". What is the reason from
a hardware perspective that the devices would be logically grouped
together?
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
