> -----Original Message----- > From: devicetree-discuss- > [email protected] [mailto:devicetree- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of > David VomLehn > Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 4:45 PM > To: [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: Wrapping proprietary nodes > > I expect my device tree will have some proprietary, one-off devices in it. > Is it better to wrap these all up in one node: > > cisco { > device1 { > ... > }; > device2 { > ... > }; > }; > > Or should they be specified one node at a time: > > cisco-device1 { > ... > }; > cisco-device2 { > ... > }; > > My inclination is for the former, but I'd prefer to follow existing usage, > if any.
(David, long time no see...:) The device tree should represent your hardware as it is. If these devices sit on some bus, then you should probably represent the bus, with the devices as subnodes. Don't create logical container nodes unless they are warranted for some good reason. Stuart _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
