On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:59:00AM +0530, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > or we might end up with two device nodes for the same hardware. > > Cc: Andres Salomon <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c | 3 +++ > include/linux/of.h | 12 ++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c > index 6f39cab..3f2ad26 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ > #include <linux/acpi.h> > #include <linux/bcd.h> > #include <linux/pnp.h> > +#include <linux/of.h> > > #include <asm/vsyscall.h> > #include <asm/x86_init.h> > @@ -236,6 +237,8 @@ static __init int add_rtc_cmos(void) > } > } > #endif > + if (of_have_populated_dt()) > + return 0;
Hmmm, should this hunk be moved to the next patch to preserve bisectability? g. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
