On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:02 PM, David Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Does this mean that the dtc inside the kernel is going to be the
> required tool to use to build device trees? This change doesn't change
> the DTB format, so it's as much of a concern, but was wondering if we're
> intending to keep things compatible.
>
To be honest, I don't know enough to say either way. I am using the
character
literals in a device tree that is used to configure a single firmware image
for
multiple boards. That device tree is not currently passed on to the kernel.
Your question makes me think that there are two device tree compilers that I
should be paying attention to, is that the case? Or was it a more general
comment about diverging from a historic syntax for device tree source files?
Thanks,
Anton
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
