On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:11 PM, David Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Also, the dts form is defined in the ePAPR documents, and this would be
> a (minor) divergence from that.
>
>
Thanks for the pointer, I had not read the ePAPR docs, I scanned them (will
read in more depth later) and didn't find any surprises.
So I guess the question is, are we comfortable with a divergence from the
spec there, and if so, are character literals generally useful enough to be
considered for inclusion in the canonical dtc? Jon, do you have a feeling
one way or the other about character literal support?
Thanks,
Anton
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
