> > Well, to be honest I'd love to have this syntax several years ago :). > > [...] > > Ok, here's what I suggest. For now, can you create a patch which > recognizes the character construct syntax in the lexer (including > escapes), and allows its use in cell context. That won't actually do > what you want, but it gets a fair chunk of the code in a testable, > upstreamable form without making syntax changes I'm uncomfortable > with. > > While we're getting that merged we can debate which/how to proceed > with either variable size cell syntax or allowing the character > literals in bytestring context.
Is it worth investigating any of the work I did down this line several years ago? It's all still in the "test" branch if so. jdl _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
