On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:23:30PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > I think adding another property is the wrong approach. The information > is already there in the interrupt binding. irq_create_of_mapping almost > does what you need. Perhaps it could be extended to return the type as > part of the irq resource. There are already defined resource bits for this:
That looks like a sensible place to put the translation but it (or the dt_translate() op it calls) is still going to need to figure out the value to return from somewhere and if the interrupt binding defines that information it's not terribly obvious. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
