* Linus Walleij <[email protected]> [120206 08:58]: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Stephen Warren <[email protected]> wrote: > > I will certainly finalize the pinctrl subsystem as-is, adding the > pin configurations states as the last major piece. If for nothing > else it provides some understanding of the problem space. > > I think we should keep both for the time being and consider the > alternative approach when patches appear. So if/when someone > creates a new subsystem like this, drivers can move over to it on a > per-driver basis. If there are zero drivers left in pinctrl it can be > deleted.
Yes it seems that we can easily do both. So far the only change needed for pinctrl drivers containing no data is that we should make the string names optional and structure debugfs around the physical register addresses instead. I'm basically just setting the mux register physcal address as the pin name for now to work around this. Regards, Tony _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
