* Linus Walleij <[email protected]> [120206 11:25]: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Tony Lindgren <[email protected]> wrote: > > > So far the only > > change needed for pinctrl drivers containing no data is that > > we should make the string names optional and structure debugfs > > around the physical register addresses instead. I'm basically > > just setting the mux register physcal address as the pin name > > for now to work around this. > > OK please make a patch to do it really optional in the core if > you find the time, it seems like a good change anyway, because > it will make it possible to reduce some current pin name lists > quite easily.
OK, will take a look at that. > If you need to change the layout of debugfs just do it. > > I actually had something like unnamed pins in the early patches > to register a bunch of anonymous pins ranges, so why not bring > it back in. Yeah it seems that the mux registers should be listed, it might require a little bit of thinking for cases where one register controls multiple pins. So maybe we need just a new entry for mux registers? Regards, Tony _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
