On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:36:07 -0700, Rhyland Klein <[email protected]> wrote:
> Add device tree based initialization support for TI's tps65910 pmic.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rhyland Klein <[email protected]>

Patch description is rather light. I like to see some more details
about what the patch changes and testing details are nice too, but
I'll ack it anyway:

Acked-by: Grant Likely <[email protected]>

> ---
>  v2: split mfd portion into single change to add dt support
>      added of_node to config before calling regulator_register
>      removed passing pdata to mfd_cell child devices
>      removed use_dt_for_init_data flag
> 
>  drivers/mfd/tps65910.c |   81 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
> index 70a8079..248fe9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>  #include <linux/mfd/core.h>
>  #include <linux/regmap.h>
>  #include <linux/mfd/tps65910.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>  
>  static struct mfd_cell tps65910s[] = {
>       {
> @@ -66,6 +67,78 @@ static const struct regmap_config tps65910_regmap_config = 
> {
>       .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE,
>  };
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static struct of_device_id tps65910_of_match[] = {
> +     { .compatible = "ti,tps65910", .data = (void *)TPS65910},
> +     { .compatible = "ti,tps65911", .data = (void *)TPS65911},
> +     { },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tps65910_of_match);
> +
> +static struct tps65910_board *tps65910_parse_dt(struct i2c_client *client,
> +                                             int *chip_id)
> +{
> +     struct device_node *np = client->dev.of_node;
> +     struct tps65910_board *board_info;
> +     unsigned int prop;
> +     const struct of_device_id *match;
> +     unsigned int prop_array[TPS6591X_MAX_NUM_GPIO];
> +     int ret = 0;
> +     int idx;
> +
> +     match = of_match_device(tps65910_of_match, &client->dev);
> +     if (!match) {
> +             dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to find matching dt id\n");
> +             return NULL;
> +     }
> +
> +     *chip_id  = (int)match->data;
> +
> +     board_info = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*board_info),
> +                     GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (!board_info) {
> +             dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to allocate pdata\n");
> +             return NULL;
> +     }
> +
> +     ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "ti,vmbch-threshold", &prop);
> +     if (!ret)
> +             board_info->vmbch_threshold = prop;
> +     else if (*chip_id == TPS65911)
> +             dev_warn(&client->dev, "VMBCH-Threshold not specified");
> +
> +     ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "ti,vmbch2-threshold", &prop);
> +     if (!ret)
> +             board_info->vmbch2_threshold = prop;
> +     else if (*chip_id == TPS65911)
> +             dev_warn(&client->dev, "VMBCH2-Threshold not specified");
> +
> +     ret = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "ti,en-gpio-sleep",
> +                                prop_array, TPS6591X_MAX_NUM_GPIO);
> +     if (!ret)
> +             for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(prop_array); idx++)
> +                     board_info->en_gpio_sleep[idx] = (prop_array[idx] != 0);
> +     else if (ret != -EINVAL) {
> +             dev_err(&client->dev,
> +                     "error reading property ti,en-gpio-sleep: %d\n.", ret);
> +             return NULL;
> +     }
> +
> +
> +     board_info->irq = client->irq;
> +     board_info->irq_base = -1;
> +     board_info->gpio_base = -1;
> +
> +     return board_info;
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline struct tps65910_board *tps65910_parse_dt(
> +                                     struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> +     return NULL;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  static int tps65910_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
>                           const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>  {
> @@ -73,8 +146,13 @@ static int tps65910_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
>       struct tps65910_board *pmic_plat_data;
>       struct tps65910_platform_data *init_data;
>       int ret = 0;
> +     int chip_id = id->driver_data;
>  
>       pmic_plat_data = dev_get_platdata(&i2c->dev);
> +
> +     if (!pmic_plat_data && i2c->dev.of_node)
> +             pmic_plat_data = tps65910_parse_dt(i2c, &chip_id);
> +
>       if (!pmic_plat_data)
>               return -EINVAL;
>  
> @@ -91,7 +169,7 @@ static int tps65910_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
>       i2c_set_clientdata(i2c, tps65910);
>       tps65910->dev = &i2c->dev;
>       tps65910->i2c_client = i2c;
> -     tps65910->id = id->driver_data;
> +     tps65910->id = chip_id;
>       mutex_init(&tps65910->io_mutex);
>  
>       tps65910->regmap = regmap_init_i2c(i2c, &tps65910_regmap_config);
> @@ -149,6 +227,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver tps65910_i2c_driver = {
>       .driver = {
>                  .name = "tps65910",
>                  .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +                .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(tps65910_of_match),
>       },
>       .probe = tps65910_i2c_probe,
>       .remove = tps65910_i2c_remove,
> -- 
> 1.7.0.4
> 

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to