On 12 July 2012 18:32, Mark Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 06:11:05PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > >> And Mark, this touches various samsung stuff in arch/arm/ so if you're ok, >> I'd like to pick this up in samsung tree. We don't want to see conflicts... > > Well, simple conflicts aren't that big a deal... However, Thomas > mentioned that in order to test this he merged the SPI tree into your > tree so perhaps there is also a dependency on the SPI tree? If that was > just for good practice testing then I agree that the best thing is to > merge via your tree, otherwise we might need to think harder.
There were no dependency on Grant's spi/next branch. It was merged just to ensure that nothing is broken. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
