On 07/13/12 01:16, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 07:13:37PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote:
On 12 July 2012 18:32, Mark Brown<[email protected]> wrote:
Well, simple conflicts aren't that big a deal... However, Thomas
mentioned that in order to test this he merged the SPI tree into your
tree so perhaps there is also a dependency on the SPI tree? If that was
just for good practice testing then I agree that the best thing is to
merge via your tree, otherwise we might need to think harder.
There were no dependency on Grant's spi/next branch. It was merged
just to ensure that nothing is broken.
OK, great - then the Samsung tree it is.
Thanks, will apply.
Mark, if you want to add your ack or review on them, let me know.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <[email protected]>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
