Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 22:11 Tue 21 Aug , Stephen Warren wrote: >> From: Stephen Warren <[email protected]> >> >> I figured the easiest way to get named constants into dtc would be to >> re-use an existing C pre-processor implemntation. Surprisingly, I >could >> not find many /good/ possibilities for this. I eventually found one >called >> gpp. This patch is an extremely quick-and-dirty integration of gpp >into >> dtc in order to solicit some feedback. What do people think of this >> approach in general? > >I'm not sure it's rely the right way > >I does the support but we may just use gcc for as it's done for linker >script >but I will agree that with this dtc is standalone A C-compiler's pre-processor gets confused by property names starting with #, which gpp at least can be configured not to (outside column 1 at least) -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
