On 16:26 Sat 25 Aug , Stephen Warren wrote: > > > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[email protected]> wrote: > > >On 22:11 Tue 21 Aug , Stephen Warren wrote: > >> From: Stephen Warren <[email protected]> > >> > >> I figured the easiest way to get named constants into dtc would be to > >> re-use an existing C pre-processor implemntation. Surprisingly, I > >could > >> not find many /good/ possibilities for this. I eventually found one > >called > >> gpp. This patch is an extremely quick-and-dirty integration of gpp > >into > >> dtc in order to solicit some feedback. What do people think of this > >> approach in general? > > > >I'm not sure it's rely the right way > > > >I does the support but we may just use gcc for as it's done for linker > >script > >but I will agree that with this dtc is standalone > > A C-compiler's pre-processor gets confused by property names starting with #, > which gpp at least can be configured not to (outside column 1 at least) ok fine by me
Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
