Hi Stephen, Thanks for the review,
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 07:32:38, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 09/01/2012 12:05 AM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 14:59:21, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote: > >> Modify c_can binding documentation according to recent review comments > >> on device tree data addition patches. > > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/c_can.txt > >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/c_can.txt > >> index a43f083..90a70be 100644 > >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/c_can.txt > >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/c_can.txt > >> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ Required properties: > >> registers map > >> - interrupts : property with a value describing the interrupt > >> number > >> +- status : describes the node status either "disabled" or > >> + "okay" > > That's a standrd property that applies to any node, and doesn't describe > data required by the device itself (as do regs/interrupts) by simply > whether the node is activated; I'm not sure it's worth mentioning it in > a device-specific binding. > > A similar comment exists for the pre-existing description of > interrupt-parent below. > > >> Optional properties: > >> - interrupt-parent : The parent interrupt controller > Then, I will remove these properties from the doc. Thanks AnilKumar _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
