On 09/28/2012 12:53 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote: >>> >>> Yeah, seems like the kernel DTC is quite old. >> >> FYI, I'm working on a patch to the kernel to bring in the latest dtc. > > Awesome. Thank you. > >> I've run a regression test vs. the old dtc in the kernel ... > > Which is the icky step. Again, thank you. > >> ... and found that >> some of the PowerPC .dts files don't compile with the new dtc (but did >> with the old), all due to non-existent labels/paths being referenced. >> I'll try and track down whether this is a regression in dtc, or simply >> buggy .dts files that weren't noticed before. > > I think you should just smack the PowerPC guys. :-)
For the record in this thread, it was a regression I introduced into dtc - the patch I just sent was for this. >> Everything non-PowerPC works fine, and most PowerPC files work fine. >> Where compilation succeeds, the md5sum of the .dtb is identical in every >> case. ... and with that patch, every .dts in the kernel compiles to the same md5sum before/after. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
