On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 01:05:33PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/28/2012 12:53 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Yeah, seems like the kernel DTC is quite old.
> >>
> >> FYI, I'm working on a patch to the kernel to bring in the latest dtc.
> >
> > Awesome. Thank you.
> >
> >> I've run a regression test vs. the old dtc in the kernel ...
> >
> > Which is the icky step. Again, thank you.
> >
> >> ... and found that
> >> some of the PowerPC .dts files don't compile with the new dtc (but did
> >> with the old), all due to non-existent labels/paths being referenced.
> >> I'll try and track down whether this is a regression in dtc, or simply
> >> buggy .dts files that weren't noticed before.
> >
> > I think you should just smack the PowerPC guys. :-)
>
> For the record in this thread, it was a regression I introduced into dtc
> - the patch I just sent was for this.
I would be nice to add a testcase for this regression into dtc.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
