On 11/19/2012 10:19 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 10:12:10PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:46:15PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: >>> On 11/14/2012 11:31 PM, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: >>>> Hello Russell, >>>> >>>> With the 2 changes I have done on according your comments >>>> do you think you can give your acked-by for this patch? >>>> >>> >>> Hello Russell, >>> >>> I didn't have any feedback from you for this version. >>> If you are fine with this, could you give your Acked-by? >>> >>> >> >> Gregory, >> >> >From the looks of things, Russell has his head wrapped around buggy >> sound driver code for the CuBox. Perhaps Will Deacon or Catalin Marinas >> would care to weigh in? I'm reluctant to take the series without an >> Acked-By from at least one of them. > > Well, I would like to say - it should go through my tree, as it's generic > ARM changes, and as very little (even generic stuff) seems to come through > my tree anymore. But that's going to make the remainder of your patches > difficult to merge. >
When I asked if it was possible to Arnd and Olof to take this patch in their tree with your Acked-by, you didn't raise any objection. At this moment it would have been possible to rework the patch set. But now I am afraid that we are out of time to do it in a proper way. Now if you really want to get this patch through your patch system instead of giving a acked-by, well then I will do my best, of course, to fulfil your requirements. But in this case I would have appreciate to be notified earlier. Thanks, Gregory _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
