* Peter Ujfalusi <[email protected]> [130415 01:30]: > On 04/10/2013 10:34 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Yeah how about just change the pintctrl-single,bits register > > naming to be register + bit? Something like 0xdeadbeef.0 and > > 0xdeadbeef.1 and so on. > > Something like this might work I think. It is going to be a bit tricky IMHO > since we might need span out new 'register' every time a device requests for a > new pinctrl-single,bits for already used register in the > pinctrl-single,bit-per-mux area. In this way we still can make sure that > certain bit are only used by a single driver.
OK. If it's one bit per mux type register we should be able to create the right amount of entries based on the submask in pinctrs-single,bit? Regards, Tony _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
