On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:57:36AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:

> Hi Mark, this was especially tricky due to the absence of a
> function to get a named regulator without a device node. After
> some cleverness introducing a node for the board akin to the
> solution I did for Nomadik, this seems to be an acceptable way
> forward, any other suggestions welcome.

I would expect this to be bound based on the board name that appears in
the device tree which (given the way this stuff mostly works) I'd expect
to have a device node available.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to