On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:51 AM, James Hogan <james.ho...@imgtec.com> wrote:
> Should we be standardizing the pins/groups/function properties too, > since the strings are pretty much passed straight through? The usage > seems pretty similar between the drivers I've seen (except ugly vendor > prefixes), so we could presumably get away with a single implementation > of dt_node_to_map? This is an orthogonal issue I'd say. Basically this goes back to the quite prolonged discussion about device tree bindings and the fact that we added the .dt_node_to_map() and .dt_free_map() functions in the first place. I'd be happy to consolidate these mapping functions where possible, by moving to the core, basically. But that would be a separate patch series.... interested? ;-) Yours, Linus Walleij _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
