On 18/06/13 10:05, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:51 AM, James Hogan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Should we be standardizing the pins/groups/function properties too, >> since the strings are pretty much passed straight through? The usage >> seems pretty similar between the drivers I've seen (except ugly vendor >> prefixes), so we could presumably get away with a single implementation >> of dt_node_to_map? > > This is an orthogonal issue I'd say.
agreed. > Basically this goes back to the quite prolonged discussion about > device tree bindings and the fact that we added the > .dt_node_to_map() and .dt_free_map() functions in the > first place. > > I'd be happy to consolidate these mapping functions where > possible, by moving to the core, basically. > > But that would be a separate patch series.... interested? ;-) Mildly, but I can't guarantee I'll get the time. Cheers James _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
