On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 3:27 PM, James Hogan <james.ho...@imgtec.com> wrote: > On 25/06/13 14:21, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>> My thoughts were that this code would never be reached when the parsing was >> removed and to not cause confusion to the driver when an acceptable binding >> was found for slew-rate. >> >> But it of course also doesn't hurt to stay in. > > Okay, fair enough. > > Acked-by: James Hogan <james.ho...@imgtec.com> OK applied this so we have a clean slate. Patches adding it back in with SI measures will be welcomed! Yours, Linus Walleij _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
