On 25/06/13 14:32, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 3:27 PM, James Hogan <james.ho...@imgtec.com> wrote: >> On 25/06/13 14:21, Heiko Stübner wrote: > >>> My thoughts were that this code would never be reached when the parsing was >>> removed and to not cause confusion to the driver when an acceptable binding >>> was found for slew-rate. >>> >>> But it of course also doesn't hurt to stay in. >> >> Okay, fair enough. >> >> Acked-by: James Hogan <james.ho...@imgtec.com> > > OK applied this so we have a clean slate. > > Patches adding it back in with SI measures will be welcomed!
Okay. So the most descriptive documentation I can find for the slew rate in the TZ1090 pin config hardware is basically: 0: slow (half frequency) 1: fast Sounds like this pretty much precludes it from having a generic DT binding unless it can be mapped to some physical value, so I'll add a tz1090,slew-rate and use PIN_CONFIG_END+1 instead of PIN_CONFIG_SLEW_RATE. Anybody object to me adding an argument to pinconf_generic_parse_dt_config() so that an additional pinconf_generic_dt_params array can be optionally passed in? That way I can share the generic pinconf dt parsing code. Cheers James _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
