On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 07:10:06PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Markus Pargmann <m...@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx27.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx27.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx27.dtsi
> > index 8603886..10dcbd3 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx27.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx27.dtsi
> > @@ -342,6 +342,15 @@
> > reg = <0x10020000 0x20000>;
> > ranges;
> >
> > + imxfb: fb@10021000 {
>
> If it can be fixed while applying, it would be right to use just "fb" here.
> We now use a lot of devices without "imx"-prefix, so I do not see any need to
> use it here.
I actually prefer to use the block name if it's not a thing defined by
ePAPR. In this case, it's "lcdc". But since "fb" is already used in
compatible. Okay, I fixed it up by dropping "imx" prefix.
Applied the whole series, thanks.
Shawn
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
